Simulation-Based Education In UK Nursing Training

Introduction

Imagine a dimly lit simulation suite where a first-year nursing student, eyes wide, straps on a stethoscope and approaches a plastic patient that lies lifelike on a hospital bed. The manikin’s heart monitor beeps and its chest rises with a synthetic breath. In that moment, it is not a silicone toy but a critical-care patient requiring attention. This is Simulation-Based Education (SBE), an educational “flight simulator” for nurses, letting learners rehearse crises without risking real lives.

SBE in nursing uses high-tech and low-tech methods from ‘high-fidelity manikins’ to role-playing actors to replace or amplify real clinical experience with guided practice (Royal College of Nursing, 2023). In educational theory, this approach echoes Kolb’s cycle of experiential learning, giving students concrete experience, reflection, and active experimentation before they meet actual patients. In practice, SBE is often described as “an educational method which uses a variety of modalities to support students in developing their knowledge, behaviours and skills, with opportunity for repetition, feedback, evaluation and reflection” (Harrison et al. 2024). Like no pilot would board a plane without simulator hours, nursing students too improve skills in simulation suites before taking care of real patients (Herrera-Aliaga and Estrada, 2022). As one review notes, clinical simulation is “a technique, not a technology, to replace or amplify real experiences” (Herrera-Aliaga and Estrada, 2022), highlighting that it is the ‘guided practice’ and ‘debriefing’, not the gadgetry itself, that improves learning.

Discussion

Methods of Simulation in Nursing Education

Simulation in nursing employs a variety of methods to recreate clinical situations. Each method immerses students in powerful scenarios with sensory detail and emotional weight:

High-Fidelity Manikins

These life-like manikins, or medical training mannequins, can cry out, seize, bleed and even follow instructions (San Antonio Report, 2019). In a typical UK SBE learning environment, a student may have to listen to the distinct pattern of noise of a manikin’s artificial lungs or push on its chest as the heart monitor flatlines. The Anglia Ruskin University Research Team highlights that programmes use “a wide range of patient simulators and part task trainers from low to high fidelity” (Harrison et al. 2024). For example, a mannequin named “Harvey” from the US Navy simulates heart sounds so realistically that students hold stethoscopes to its chest as if treating a real cardiac patient (Patrizio et al., 2024). In this safe setting, students scramble to insert IV lines or defibrillator pads and learn to respond to alarms. They can make many mistakes like giving a drug too fast, or failing to check a patient wristband, but without the risk of harming anyone. As the Anglia Ruskin Team put it, simulation “provides [students] with the opportunity to practise skills in a safe environment” (Harrison et al. 2024). The controlled yet realistic nature of high-fidelity sims (simulations) lets learners build muscle memory and situational awareness under an instructor’s close supervision. This training is closest to the real nursing experience without the risk: monitors beeping, synthetic skin under fingers, and heart pumps ticking; yet everything is safe since the scenario is artificial.

Top UK Assignment Cities

Virtual Reality (VR) and Augmented Reality (AR)

This next-generation tech consists of overlaying the digital on the physical. In VR simulations, students put on headsets and find themselves at a virtual patient’s bedside, or in an ambulance rushing to an emergency (Tovar et al., 2023). One recent UK study had students practice scenarios in an immersive VR program and found that “they found the VR scenarios realistic… immersive…” and aided in the development of their “clinical reasoning” (Kiegaldie and Shaw, 2023). This paper found that Students appreciated being able to repeat a scenario endlessly; one nursing student in particular said, “I really enjoyed being part of Jasper^VR and I felt it was a really nice way to learn the situation… the best thing was I can rewatch it as many times as I want” (Kiegaldie and Shaw, 2023). Many reported that VR felt less intimidating than a live simulation; without peers watching, they could make mistakes without shame and learn from them.

Augmented Reality (AR), on the other hand, inserts computer graphics into the real world. Imagine a student wearing AR glasses and seeing virtual x-rays projected over a manikin’s chest or anatomical labels floating above a practice patient. While still emerging, AR prototypes allow, for instance, seeing a beating virtual heart on a silicone dummy (Jung et al., 2022). These virtual tools let student nurses experience rare or dangerous cases like eclampsia or severe trauma anywhere; even at home.

Task Trainers and Skills Labs

For basic hands-on skills, part-task trainers demonstrate their capacity well. These range from injection pads, IV arms, catheter models, wound-care simulators, to birthing simulators with baby mannequins (Harrison et al., 2014). In a UK university skills lab, the air often smells of antiseptic while students practice inserting a Foley catheter into a silicone pelvis or starting an IV on a translucent arm with veins (Royal College of Nursing, 2021; Association of Surgical Technologists, 2017). These low-cost models focus on muscle memory: the finesse of drawing up blood, tying a surgical knot, or palpating a swollen ankle. Instructors guide each motion, and students repeat until it feels instinctual. Though basic, such trainers are crucial; one program used them daily to ensure every student mastered blood pressure, wound packing, and CPR before trying on volunteers. The goal is to embed skills so deeply that in a real ward, the motions become automatic. As one UK research noted, SBE gives “learning opportunities for our students to practise in safe, realistic environments, with a wide range of patient simulators and part task trainers” (Harrison et al. 2024). These drills are like playing scales before a concert; sometimes tedious, but the foundation for confident performance.

Scenario-Based Roleplay with Standardized Patients

The most human element comes from standardized patients; actors or trained volunteers playing sick roles. Consider a simulation theatre, where a curtain parts to reveal an elderly woman feigning chest pain and confusion, or a young man dramatizing depression. Student nurses take histories, perform examinations and practice bedside manner on these actors. The actors improvise symptoms and emotional cues: maybe the patient clenches her arm when prodded, or gasps for breath on purpose (Caravaca-Morera et al., 2024). Afterward, the student and actor debrief; the patient-actor might comment, “Your calm voice really helped,” or “I still felt rushed and scared,” giving invaluable feedback on communication. Research on Standardized Patients shows they provide authentic feedback on empathy and professionalism (Young, Johnsen and Shi, 2023). UK educators find that mixing manikins and SPs offers the best of both: the patient’s family member might even join in to inject realism. As Harrison et al. (2024) put it, with standardized patients “we are able to use trained actors, in conjunction with the delivery of SBE”, blending technical skill practice with interpersonal training. In these roleplays, student nurses face the unpleasant or difficult human side of care, from consoling a panicking child to gently challenging a non-compliant relative; all in a classroom.

Collectively, these methods recreate wards, ambulances and homes within campus walls. A nursing simulation lab can feel like a mini-hospital where every learner is guaranteed a rare chance at critical cases: every student intubates, every student manages a code blue. The realism varies – some setups are as elaborate as a movie set, others as simple as an exam room; but the intent is always the same: immerse the student in learning by doing, not just listening.

Top UK Assignment Samples

Impact on Competence, Decision-Making, and Confidence

Decades of research and recent UK studies show that SBE benefits student nurses in three crucial ways:

Clinical Competence (skill retention, safety, reduced errors)

Simulations let students practice procedures until muscle memory and theory coincide. Evidence suggests SBE produces stronger skill retention than lectures alone. As one UK report concluded, simulation produces higher scores in knowledge and “measures of clinical competencies” than traditional placements (Harrison et al. 2024). Students can fine-tune a skill repeatedly (for example, drawing blood or managing a diabetic emergency) without pressure. This deliberate practice reduces future errors: a student who has managed dozens of anaphylaxis scenarios on a manikin is far less likely to panic when facing a real allergic shock on placement (Ren et al., 2022).

In the NMC’s recent evaluation of UK nursing programs, tutors found that practice learning in simulation “enhancing competence and supporting confidence” (Holt, 2024), safely building skills before students meet real patients. Likewise, the Council of Deans’ review notes that SBE allowed learners to “achieve proficiencies not encountered in clinical practice” (Harrison et al. 2024), meaning core skills that might otherwise be missed in sparse ward experiences were now mastered in class. For example, one program simulated a complex neonatal emergency – something many adult hospitals rarely see – ensuring all student midwives can resuscitate a newborn if needed. In short, SBE acts like a gym for nursing skills: repeated safe workouts make clinical muscles strong and error-averse.

Decision-Making and Clinical Judgement (thinking under pressure)

Simulation thrusts students into high-stakes decision-making in controlled bursts. During a scripted scenario, the student must interpret vital signs, recall protocols, and act – all under a ticking clock and often with an audience of peers or examiners. This training sharpens clinical judgement. As one UK research emphasized, only in simulation “can [students] follow a patient case study…through to holistic clinical decision-making…safely” (Harrison et al. 2024). Students learn not just what to do, but when to do it. They probably ask themselves: ‘Is this symptom life-threatening?’ ‘Should I call a doctor yet?’

A 2023 VR study found nursing students felt that digital simulations helped develop critical thinking for managing similar future situations (Kiegaldie and Shaw, 2023). Moreover, debriefs after each scenario force reflection on decisions, and makes nursing student ask, ‘What could have been done better?’ This makes learners consciously aware of the reasoning behind each action.

Simulation Based Education in nursing training, therefore, turns on-the-job thinking into a natural skill, so that in the vent of chaos in a real ward, students have the mental rehearsals to guide them. UK instructors report that learners emerge from simulation with a keener sense of priorities and safety: one noted that students “learnt not to make assumptions and to listen more,” skills often honed only in practice sims.

Get Assignment Help for Top Subjects

Confidence and Anxiety Reduction (increased autonomy)

Nursing students often describe simulation as a confidence booster. Repeated success in a safe setting carries over to real life. In the NMC’s evaluation, students exclaimed “I am so much more confident now” after a real-world simulation practice (Holt, 2024). Many reported feeling ready for the ward and less anxious about initial placements, even describing how SBE “reduces the stress of transition from classroom to clinical practice” (Holt, 2024). By the time they care for actual patients, mistakes in sims become learning points rather than crises, so their early practice hours feel less daunting. One survey of UK nursing students found SPL (simulated practice learning) “levels the playing field”; ensuring every student master core skills regardless of which hospital placement they get (Holt, 2024).

Likewise, it was observed that students who have done extensive simulation “hit the ground running” and speak up more confidently on placement (Harrison et al. 2024). In other words, SBE can transform most nervous beginners into self-assured novices, capable of autonomous action; although not all (Svellingen et al., 2021). The feeling is akin to training wheels being removed: students emerge knowing their practice can be safe and effective. As one student feedback noted, simulation “offer[s] consistent experiences for students” so they start practice with a solid foundation (Harrison et al. 2024). By sharpening competence and debriefing anxiety, SBE effectively short-circuits the fear that comes with inexperience.

SBE versus Traditional Training: A Learner’s Tale

To appreciate simulation’s value, consider the fictional story of Amir, a UK nursing student. In lectures, Amir struggled; theory on cardiac meds felt abstract, and he often hesitated to ask questions. His first clinical placement was nerve-wracking; faced with a real patient’s laboured breathing, he froze, feeling unprepared. Then came the simulation module. In a mock ICU, Amir intubated a manikin under duress, shouted orders to a teammate, and saw “the patient’s” vitals stabilize on the monitor. He wrestled through simulated complications and was guided gently by his instructor. By the end, Amir looked up from the manikin and laughed in relief: he had saved ‘the patient’. Suddenly, the textbook knowledge clicked into place. When he later faced another patient gasping on a ward, Amir was no longer paralyzed by fear; his mind was on autopilot, and his hands knew what to do from muscle memory.

Research mirrors Amir’s experience. The Council of Deans reported that on average “simulation-based education is more effective than traditional clinical education” at improving knowledge, clinical judgement and competency (Harrison et al. 2024). Where conventional nursing education relies on chance learning in hospital placements, hoping a student sees a certain case, simulation guarantees exposure (Baron et al., 2023). Tutors found SBE “complements learning in clinical placements and enables attainment of [required skills]” by filling gaps that placements might miss (Harrison et al. 2024). In other words, lectures and placements are necessary but uneven; simulation is the steady hand that ensures every student touches a broad spectrum of scenarios.

The contrast in narrative therefore, is distinctly visible; some students who struggle under high-stakes real-life test setting may do exceptionally well in simulations of Advanced Life Support scenarios after multiple practices in the sim lab. In a traditional model, a learner might be on their own in a busy ward, like a lone sailor thrown in a storm. Pressure, one must realize, can create diamonds as well as rubbles. Simulation based education, therefore, serves as a safe harbour where mistakes are repaired and skills are polished before sailing again.

Lessons from Japan’s “Aging Suit” Innovation

Beyond mannequins and VR, some educators are thinking creatively about empathy. In Japan, where the elderly comprise over 25% of the population (Statista, n.d.), a novel training approach has emerged: elderly simulation suits. Nurses in training put on weighted suits that restrict movement, plus goggles and earplugs to mimic visual and hearing loss, for a set time (reports suggest even daily one-hour sessions in some hospitals) (Güney and Doğan, 2024). The goal is to make trainees feel ‘frailty’ and empathize more with those in their care (Güney and Doğan, 2024). Accounts from such programs and related studies abroad describe powerful emotional effects. In one qualitative study, nursing students wearing age-simulation suits said “it was like you were in your own bubble” (Bouwmeester Stjernetun et al., 2024) – isolated, slow, and vulnerable. Ordinary tasks became exhausting and frustrating, prompting tears and empathy. They reported feeling “insecure” and “lonely,” insights only gained by living those impairments for a while (Bouwmeester Stjernetun et al., 2024).

These experiences can be ethically eye-opening. On one hand, they teach respect: a nurse who realizes how helpless an elderly person can feel is more likely to preserve dignity and patience (Akpınar Söylemez et al., 2024). One student reflected that the suit gave “an immersive experience, allowing them to identify with older persons’ vulnerability” (Bouwmeester Stjernetun et al., 2024). On the other hand, forcing such discomfort raises questions: is it exploitative to put learners through such hardship, even in the name of empathy? UK nurse educators can learn from Japan that “embodied simulation” can convey lessons no lecture or modules can. If done thoughtfully, with preparation and debrief, an hour in the “old person suit” might make future nurses gentler caregivers. A possible lesson is that even empathy itself can be trained, not just technical skills.

Implementing such intense SBE in the UK would require care; students must consent and be supported, and the exercise should link to concrete care improvements; not just shock. Nevertheless, the underlying idea, using dramatic experiential tools to bridge cognitive understanding and feeling; is powerful. It is a reminder that simulation is not only about patient safety and skills, but also about shaping hearts. For UK nursing, where an aging population is also increasing, these cross-cultural ideas suggest that practices should adopt any teaching method that deepens compassionate care alongside competence.

Challenges and Considerations in Implementing SBE

Despite its promises, simulation is not a magic wand. Simulations can feel like fitting a Ferrari engine into a Morris Minor – one can have the most advanced technology, but without the right support chassis (infrastructure, staffing, time), it cannot fully ‘drive’ improvements.

Financial and Resource Barriers

Cutting-edge manikins cost tens of thousands of pounds, and VR labs and standardized patient programs are not cheap either (Sullivan, 2023). A UK study found that the biggest barrier to SBE is resource constraints, as studies found, “the most prevalent barrier… was found to be the lack of resources”, including staffing, space, and funding. Nursing educators repeatedly express concerns that high-fidelity simulation “is very costly in terms of physical resources and staff” (Harrison et al., 2024). Many nursing schools must juggle budgets too; buying an advanced birthing simulator might mean fewer face-to-face tutors. UK trainers often share labs with other courses or have only one simulation suite for hundreds of students (Harrison et al., 2024). Even scheduling is a significant hurdle; coordinating small-group simulations for large cohorts is like a puzzle of timetables – one tutor observed that it is “difficult to fit all small groups into the timetables” (Harrison et al., 2024). Administrators, therefore, must invest heavily or risk under-utilizing the technology they buy. For the ‘Ferrari engine’ (cutting-edge labs, in this context) to drive improvements, massive capital and commitment is a must; without which the potential is as good as lost.

Faculty Development and Cultural Resistance

High-tech simulation also demands high-skilled instructors. UK research notes a lack of trained faculty and technicians as a barrier (Harrison et al., 2024). Educators need training in running scenarios and debriefing – a specialty that cannot be obtained through lectures and modules alone. Many current nursing lecturers were educated in traditional models and feel uneasy in a “studio” environment; high-tech, controlled environments where clinical scenarios are acted out using manikins, virtual tools, or standardised patients (Janse van Vuuren, Seekoe and Ter Goon, 2018). One focus group noted that senior leaders valued SBE but often “lacked a realistic view of the operational challenges” (Harrison et al., 2024). Changing culture is slow; some staff see sims as entertaining but not core content. Overcoming this requires institutional leadership; there is no substitute for “cultural change and a strategy” supporting SBE (Almotairy et al., 2023). Faculty also need time to design scenarios and learn new software – a hidden cost that is not often focused upon by existing literature. If educators are expected to layer simulation on top of old curricula without relief, it may lead to staff burnout. Thus, the human chassis under the ‘Ferrari engine’ in this context, needs reinforcing in the form of time, training, and buy-in for educators.

Curriculum Integration and Accreditation

Finally, simulation must be ‘welded’ into the program chassis, not ‘painted on’. Decisions about which proficiencies to teach ‘in-sim’ and which rely on placements are complex. One case study found that mental-health students who had multiple on-campus skills days achieved more clinical proficiencies than child-nursing students with fewer simulation days (Harrison et al., 2024), suggesting that sim outcomes depend on intentional design. UK regulators now allow up to 600 hours of simulation under the new NMC rules, but institutions must strategically map those hours. There is also the risk that simulation is viewed as merely a “gap-filler” rather than an essential pillar (Harrison et al., 2024). Integrators must ensure simulation scenarios directly reinforce learning outcomes and theory – for example, pairing a lecture on cardiac arrhythmias with an ECG-practice sim. Otherwise, the technology is under-used or misaligned.

These challenges are real, but not too great to overcome. Nursing programs must parallel their tech upgrades with investment in people and processes. Some UK universities are already doing this by creating simulation fellowships, sharing costs with medical schools, and starting “train-the-trainer” programs. The lesson is that SBE demands a holistic upgrade, not just shiny gadgets.

Recommendations

Recommendation 1: Embed a Spiral Curriculum of Simulation Across All Academic Years

Research shows that students develop stronger clinical judgment and situational awareness when simulations are structured progressively (Cant & Cooper, 2009). A longitudinal SBE approach bridges the gap between novice learning and real-world readiness (Cowperthwait, 2020).

Simulation, thus, should not be limited to isolated modules or specific years. Instead, universities must adopt a spiral curriculum model where simulation activities are revisited with increasing complexity across the three or four years of pre-registration training. This ensures that foundational psychomotor skills, critical thinking, and decision-making are reinforced through repetitive, scaffolded exposure.

Recommendation 2: Standardise Debriefing Protocols Using Evidence-Based Models

Variability in debriefing quality leads to inconsistent learning outcomes. A standard protocol ensures that all students benefit from reflective dialogue and psychological safety (Sawyer et al., 2016). It also promotes metacognitive growth and professional resilience.

Debriefing, therefore, is the cornerstone of experiential learning in simulation. Nursing schools should standardise post-simulation debriefings using structured frameworks such as PEARLS (Promoting Excellence and Reflective Learning in Simulation) or GAS (Gather-Analyse-Summarise).

Recommendation 3: Train Academic Staff as Certified Simulation Educators

Effective SBE delivery depends on the educator’s ability to facilitate scenario realism, troubleshoot equipment, and conduct psychologically safe debriefs. Studies indicate a clear correlation between educator training and simulation impact (Motola et al., 2013).

Therefore, to maintain fidelity and ensure pedagogical integrity, academic staff must be trained beyond informal use of manikins. Institutions should sponsor postgraduate training and certifications such as those offered by the Society for Simulation in Healthcare (SSH) or INACSL Standards of Best Practice.

Recommendation 4: Incorporate Interprofessional Simulation Scenarios

Interprofessional simulations improve communication, reduce medical errors, and prepare students for real NHS clinical team dynamics (Reeves et al., 2017). The WHO has long advocated for IPE to improve health outcomes (WHO, 2010).

Where possible, simulation therefore should mirror the NHS collaborative environment by integrating interprofessional education (IPE) – allowing nursing students to train alongside medical, pharmacy, and allied health students in high-fidelity team-based simulations.

Recommendation 5: Ensure Equitable Access Through Digital and Remote Simulation Options

A blended simulation model promotes flexibility, enhances accessibility, and supports asynchronous learning without compromising quality (Foronda et al., 2020). Moreover, virtual simulations have demonstrated efficacy in clinical skill acquisition and confidence-building.

Many UK nursing students, therefore particularly from underserved or rural backgrounds, may face logistical barriers to accessing on-campus simulation labs. Universities should invest in virtual simulation platforms like the Oxford Medical Simulation, and vSim for Nursing to ensure equity and inclusivity.

Conclusion: The Road Ahead for Nursing Education

Simulation Based Education in nursing training, undoubtably, has the potential to turn an initially anxious learner into a decisive, knowledgeable caregiver. Across the UK, nurse educators increasingly agree that simulation will be an indispensable feature of future nursing education, not a supplementary method. It is already reshaping curricula, enabling richer clinical competence training for student nurses and safer outcomes for patients.

Simulation-based education has come a long way from its early days. Like a powerful tide, it is washing over nursing schools, carrying theory into practice through vivid stories and hands-on challenges. Every beep of a monitor in the lab, every virtual patient examined, inches the classroom closer to the ward. Despite hurdles like funding, staffing, and integration, the evidence is clear: well-resourced SBE yields more confident, capable nurses consistently. It is an investment that pays off in lives saved and in professionals who feel ready to meet the demands of modern healthcare.

The future of UK nursing training is not far from the present model: a combination of learning models with simulation at its core. As the burden care grows more complex, SBE continues to remain immersive, repeatable, and deeply human. It reminds that nursing is as much about ‘practiced skill’ as ‘practiced compassion’. The simulation rooms, therefore, with its blinking machines, new emerging technologies, and scripted role-players; is as important as real-life training in a hospital ward. It is where the nursing students find their voice, build their confidence, and commit to the high standards of care the present UK society demands. The story of SBE in UK nursing education is still being written, but its chapters promise to be both interesting and hopeful for patients and learners alike.

References

Conference abstract in online proceedings

Baron, S., Goldsworthy, S., Muir, N., Goodhand, K. and Button, D. (2023) ‘Does virtual simulation enhance nursing students’ preparation for responding to the rapidly deteriorating patient?’, in International Research Conference 2023: Book of Abstracts. [online] Bournemouth University. Available at: https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/39078/1/Book%20of%20Abstracts%20International%20Research%20Conference%202023.pdf (Accessed: 16 June 2025).

Online journal article with DOI

Akpınar Söylemez, B., Özgül, E., Akyol, M.A. and Küçükgüçlü, Ö. (2024) ‘Effectiveness of the aged simulation suit on undergraduate nursing students’ attitudes and empathy toward older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis’, Nurse Education in Practice, 75, 103990. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2024.103990.

Almotairy, M.M., Algabbashi, M., Alshutwi, S., Shibily, F., Alsharif, F., Almutairi, W. and Nahari, A. (2023) ‘Nursing faculty perceptions of simulation culture readiness in Saudi universities: a cross-sectional study’, BMC Nursing, 22, 105. doi: 10.1186/s12912-023-01278-w.

Bouwmeester Stjernetun, B., Gillsjö, C., Odzakovic, E., Östlund, G., Falk, M., Silén, M. and Blomberg, K. (2024) ‘“It’s like walking in a bubble”: nursing students’ perspectives on age suit simulation in a home environment – group interviews from reflection seminars’, BMC Nursing, 23, p. 124. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-01792-5.

Cant, R.P. and Cooper, S.J. (2009) ‘Simulation-based learning in nurse education: systematic review’, Journal of Advanced Nursing, 66(1), pp. 3–15. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2009.05240.x.

Caravaca-Morera, J., Carmiol-Rodriguez, P., Sanabria-Barahona, H., Bellaguarda, M.L., Padilha, M.I. and Silva, A. (2024) ‘From acting to simulation: contributions of theatre students to healthcare simulation’, Teaching and Learning in Nursing. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1016/j.teln.2024.02.016.

Cowperthwait, A. (2020) ‘NLN/Jeffries simulation framework for simulated participant methodology’, Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 42, pp. 12–21. doi: 10.1016/j.ecns.2019.12.009.

Foronda, C., Fernandez-Burgos, M., Nadeau, C., Kelley, C.N. and Henry, M.N. (2020) ‘Virtual simulation in nursing education: a systematic review spanning 1996 to 2018’, Simulation in Healthcare, 15(1), pp. 46–54. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000411.

Herrera-Aliaga, E. and Estrada, L.D. (2022) ‘Trends and innovations of simulation for twenty first century medical education’, Frontiers in Public Health, 10, pp. 1–10. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.619769.

Jung, C., Wolff, G., Wernly, B., Jung, C., Bruno, R.R., Döring, M. and Jung, P. (2022) ‘Virtual and augmented reality in cardiovascular care: state-of-the-art and future perspectives’, JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging, 15(3), pp. 519–532. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2021.08.017.

Kiegaldie, D. and Shaw, L. (2023) ‘Virtual reality simulation for nursing education: effectiveness and feasibility’, BMC Nursing, 22, p. 488. doi: 10.1186/s12912-023-01639-5.

Motola, I., Devine, L.A., Chung, H.S., Sullivan, J.E. and Issenberg, S.B. (2013) ‘Simulation in healthcare education: a best evidence practical guide. AMEE Guide No. 82’, Medical Teacher, 35(10), pp. e1511–e1530. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2013.818632.

Patrizio, H.A., Phyu, R., Kim, B. and Brolis, N.V. (2024) ‘Improved cardiac auscultation competency interweaving visual, auditory, and tactile stimuli: a preliminary study’, International Journal of Medical Education, 15, pp. 37–43. doi: 10.5116/ijme.6607.27a6.

Reeves, S., Pelone, F., Harrison, R., Goldman, J. and Zwarenstein, M. (2017) ‘Interprofessional collaboration to improve professional practice and healthcare outcomes’, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2017(6), CD000072. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000072.pub3.

Ren, Q., Chen, F., Zhang, H., Tu, J., Xu, X. and Liu, C. (2022) ‘Effects of a standardized patient-based simulation in anaphylactic shock management for new graduate nurses’, BMC Nursing, 21, p. 209. doi: 10.1186/s12912-022-00995-y.

Sawyer, T., Eppich, W., Brett-Fleegler, M., Grant, V. and Cheng, A. (2016) ‘More than one way to debrief: a critical review of healthcare simulation debriefing methods’, Simulation in Healthcare, 11(3), pp. 209–217. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000148.

Svellingen, A.H., Røykenes, K., Forstrønen, A., Assmus, J. and Brattebø, G. (2021) ‘Examining predictive factors of nursing students’ self-confidence in multiple simulation sessions: a randomized controlled study’, Nurse Education in Practice, 56, 103231. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2021.103231.

Tovar, M.A., Zebley, J.A., Higgins, M., Herur-Raman, A., Zwemer, C.H., Pierce, A.Z. and Phillips, J.P. (2023) ‘Exposure to a virtual reality mass-casualty simulation elicits a differential sympathetic response in medical trainees and attending physicians’, Prehospital and Disaster Medicine, 38(1), pp. 48–56. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X22002448.

Young, L.B., Johnsen, D.C. and Shi, W. (2023) ‘Student empathy in standardized patient experiences: applying concepts from a critical thinking emulation model’, Journal of Dental Education, 87(12), pp. 1682–1691. doi: 10.1002/jdd.13352.

Online thesis/dissertation

Sullivan, P. (2023) The impact of virtual reality on the healthcare industry. [online] Thesis (Undergraduate). Bryant University. Available at: https://digitalcommons.bryant.edu/honors_cis/9/ (Accessed: 16 June 2025).

Report accessed online

Association of Surgical Technologists (2017) Guidelines for best practices in urinary catheterization. [online] Approved April 13, 2008; revised February 1, 2015; revised April 14, 2017. San Diego: AST. Available at: https://www.ast.org/uploadedFiles/Main_Site/Content/About_Us/Standard_Urinary_Catheterization.pdf (Accessed: 16 June 2025).

Güney, S. and Doğan, Ö.Ç. (2024) ‘The effect of aged simulation suit on nursing students’ empathy, attitudes, and willingness to care for older adults: experimental trial mixed-method study’, Educational Gerontology. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1080/03601277.2024.2418107.

Harrison, N., Edmonds, M., Meads, C., Abdulmohdi, N., Prothero, L. & Shaw, S. (2024) Simulation in Nursing Education: An Evidence Base for the Future. Anglia Ruskin University Research Team, January. Available at: https://www.councilofdeans.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/CoDH-ARU-Simulation-in-Nursing-Education-Report-Jan-2024.pdf (Accessed: 16 June 2025).

Janse van Vuuren, V., Seekoe, E. and Ter Goon, D. (2018) ‘The perceptions of nurse educators regarding the use of high fidelity simulation in nursing education’, Africa Journal of Nursing and Midwifery, 20(1), pp. 1–20. doi: 10.25159/2520-5293/1685.

Royal College of Nursing (2021) Catheter Care: RCN guidance for health care professionals. [online] London: RCN. Available at: https://www.rcn.org.uk/-/media/Royal-College-Of-Nursing/Documents/Publications/2021/July/009-915.pdf (Accessed: 16 June 2025).

Royal College of Nursing (2023) RCN position on the use of simulation‑based learning in pre and post registration education. 17 August. Available at: https://www.rcn.org.uk/About-us/Our-Influencing-work/Position-statements/rcn-position-statement-on-the-use-of-simulation-based-learning (Accessed: 16 June 2025).

San Antonio Report (2019) High‑Tech Medical Mannequins Bleed, Cry – And Train Medical Personnel, 29 January. San Antonio Report. Available at: https://sanantonioreport.org/high-tech-medical-mannequins-bleed-cry-and-train-medical-personnel/ (Accessed: 16 June 2025).

World Health Organization (2010) Framework for action on interprofessional education and collaborative practice. [online] Geneva: WHO. Available at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/framework-for-action-on-interprofessional-education-collaborative-practice (Accessed: 16 June 2025).

Web Page by Organisation

Statista (no date) Age distribution in Japan. [online] Statista. Available at: https://www.statista.com/statistics/270087/age-distribution-in-japan/ (Accessed: 16 June 2025).