Sainsbury Organizational Structure Analysis

Introduction

Overview of Sainsbury’s Structure

J Sainsbury plc is a UK-based public limited company operating supermarkets, convenience stores and retail services (including online shopping) (Sainsbury, 2024). It employs about 170,000 people and had £32bn turnover (J Sainsbury plc, 2024). The company is organised hierarchically. At the top sits a Board of Directors (including a Chair and Executive Directors), followed by an Executive Committee (led by the Chief Executive) (Sainsbury, 2025). Below this are several layers of management: executive directors heading major functions (Finance, Operations, Marketing, HR, etc.) and divisional heads (e.g. Head of Food Retail, Head of Financial Services) (Sainsbury, 2025). Stores are grouped by region under area managers, who oversee store managers. In practice, Sainsbury’s uses a functional structure with some divisional elements: functions (like supply chain or HR) operate centrally, while retail operations are divided by geography and store type. It could be described as a tall (many levels) organisation with relatively narrow spans of control. Although not officially “matrix”, cross-functional teams are sometimes formed for projects (e.g. a team for launching a new product line) (J Sainsbury plc., 2021).

Institutional and UK Regulatory Context

Sainsbury’s structure is shaped by its obligations under the UK Corporate Governance Code (2023), which emphasises board independence, risk oversight, and accountability (Dabor, 2023). As a publicly listed entity, the company must ensure board-level committees for audit, remuneration, and nominations are active and independent.

In addition, stakeholder expectations under ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) reporting standards {such as those promoted by the Financial Reporting Council (FRC)} require that sustainability and ethical supply chains are managed across divisional boundaries, challenging in a siloed structure (FRC, 2024). Regulatory pressure around anti-competitive behaviour (post-Sainsbury’s-Asda merger failure) also necessitates a clear and defensible reporting hierarchy (Smith, 2023).

Furthermore, the Companies Act 2006 places legal responsibility on directors to promote the long-term success of the company (Shapsugova, 2023). This regulatory environment necessitates a structure that ensures transparent decision-making, robust oversight, and strategic coherence.

Impact on Business Objectives

Impact on Communication and Decision-Making

In Sainsbury’s hierarchical model, information and directives primarily flow top-down. Strategic decisions (e.g. pricing strategy, major investments) are made by the board and executive team and cascaded down. This can ensure clear accountability and consistency across the chain (Pfaf et al., 2023). For example, a group-wide decision to standardise product layout in stores is uniformly implemented through regional and store managers. However, multiple layers can slow communication (Dike, 2025). Store-level concerns (like local customer feedback) may take time to reach senior management, and urgent decisions (e.g. a quick promotion on perishable goods) might require approval through several levels. The span of control (each manager oversees a few subordinates) means control is strong but employees may feel less empowered. In terms of decision-making style, Sainsbury’s tends to be relatively centralised: key decisions (budget allocation, major IT systems, national marketing campaigns) are made at head office, aligning with classic bureaucratic or machine-organisation models (Ljevo and Šunje, 2021). This supports efficiency and risk control, but can hinder rapid innovation.

Top UK Assignment Samples

Efficiency and Hierarchy

The hierarchical structure provides clear roles and responsibilities, aiding operational efficiency. Processes are standardised: e.g. all supermarkets follow central guidelines for stock replenishment and staff scheduling. Economies of scale are realised by centralising functions like procurement and logistics. However, as Mintzberg notes, machine bureaucracies work best in stable environments (Wonnink, 2025), whereas retail faces frequent change (consumer trends, online disruption). Sainsbury’s structure may therefore limit agility. For instance, responding to a new competitor’s pricing might take time as proposals move up the hierarchy. Moreover, multiple management layers can increase overhead costs (each layer has managers and admin support) (Wolfram, I. and Székely, 2021). Conversely, the narrow span of control can improve supervision quality, but at the cost of communication delay.

Alignment with Strategic Goals and Culture

Sainsbury’s vision (“Making good food joyful, accessible and affordable for everyone, every day”) emphasizes customer focus and agility (J Sainsbury plc, 2025). A hierarchical structure can support customer consistency (all stores meeting baseline standards) (Fu et al., 2022). However, it may conflict with goals of innovation and digital transformation. For example, Sainsbury’s “Plan for Better” strategy (focusing on sustainability and convenience) requires cross-disciplinary initiatives (Sainsbury, n.d.). The existing structure requires coordinated committees and cross-functional teams, which can be cumbersome. In terms of company values (“creating value responsibly”), the structure’s controls help ensure compliance (e.g. adherence to ethical sourcing).

Sainsbury’s “Food First” strategy (prioritizing core groceries) has been bolstered by its structure: it consolidated food categories under a single director to focus leadership (J Sainsbury plc, 2025). Yet, the acquisition of Argos and integration of general merchandise required a more divisional approach, which at times has led to complexity (Rusanen, 2023). The ongoing restructuring (e.g. merging convenience and online channels) suggests the company is adjusting its structure to better fit strategy.

Top UK Assignment Cities

Application of Organisational Theory

Mintzberg’s Configurations: Machine Bureaucracy

Sainsbury’s structure aligns closely with Mintzberg’s machine bureaucracy model, characterised by high formalisation, standardised procedures, and centralised decision-making (Irwansyah, 2021). The firm’s multiple layers of control and reliance on codified processes for stock replenishment, customer service, and performance evaluation illustrate a classic example of structured operational consistency (van Engelenhoven et al., 2023).

Chandler’s Strategy–Structure Alignment

Alfred Chandler’s thesis that “structure follows strategy” is evident in Sainsbury’s transition from a food-first retailer to a diversified services group (Kühl, 2023). Its acquisition of Argos and entry into financial services have driven structural realignment, adding complexity and necessitating divisional expansion (Xiao et al., 2021). The attempt to unify its online and physical channels reflects Chandler’s view that strategic shifts necessitate corresponding structural adaptation.

Contingency Theory and Fayol’s Span of Control

Contingency theory posits that the optimal structure depends on environmental variables such as market turbulence and technology (Chatterjee and Chaudhuri, 2022). While Sainsbury’s hierarchy is suited for stable operational control, it is less responsive to disruption from agile e-commerce competitors. Fayol’s principles of administration, particularly the scalar chain and unity of command, remain visible in the company’s layered supervision system (Islam et al., 2022). However, the narrow span of control at middle management levels may contribute to slower communication and reduced initiative at the front line.

Impact of Structure on Sainsbury’s Strategic Objectives

Communication and Decision-Making Flows

The centralised nature of decision-making promotes policy consistency across over 1,400 stores, but the vertical hierarchy slows response times to local or time-sensitive challenges. For instance, store-level adaptations to local market demands (e.g. changing product displays or pricing strategies) require multiple approvals, reducing agility. Gulick’s POSDCORB model (Planning, Organising, Staffing, Directing, Coordinating, Reporting, Budgeting) explains Sainsbury’s strong control mechanisms, but also its administrative overhead (Nwadike and Igbudu, 2024).

Get Assignment Help for Top Subjects

Operational Efficiency and Standardisation

The structure enables economies of scale through central procurement, consistent branding, and coordinated logistics (Sudirjo, 2023; Okolue et al., 2024). Standard operating procedures ensure uniform customer experience, quality control, and regulatory compliance. This is particularly important given the UK’s stringent food safety and employment regulations, which demand traceability and consistency (Brooks et al., 2021).

Strategic Agility and Innovation Constraints

The downside of this efficiency is reduced agility. As a machine bureaucracy, Sainsbury’s struggles with rapid innovation and cross-silo collaboration (Carreno, 2024). Introducing new technology, launching campaigns, or altering service models often requires navigating a bureaucratic path. Innovation suffers when operational units are siloed, and when incentives are misaligned across departments (Jeleel-Ojuade, 2024).

Cultural Alignment and Strategic Fit

The structure does support core strategic aims such as the “Food First” initiative, with a dedicated leadership unit for grocery, and the “Plan for Better” sustainability goals, though integration across units remains challenging. Embedding ESG and digital-first initiatives requires more fluid collaboration than the current structure naturally supports, raising questions about long-term strategic alignment.

Comparative Analysis – British Heart Foundation

In contrast, the British Heart Foundation (BHF) is a UK charity (Avkiran, 2022). Its structure is much flatter. A Board of Trustees governs overall strategy, delegating day-to-day operations to a small Executive Group (CEO and direct reports) (British Heart Foundation, 2024)). This is akin to a professional bureaucracy: highly skilled staff (scientists, fundraisers) with substantial autonomy in their areas (Monteiro and Adler, 2022). Communication in BHF is more lateral and less formal; staff can more readily approach leadership. Decision-making is collaborative – for example, research grant decisions involve committees (as shown by BHF’s multiple program committees) (British Heart Foundation, 2024)). This flat structure allows agility in responding to funding opportunities or public health campaigns, aligning with the charity’s mission to rapidly support heart research.

Implications for Business Objectives

Sainsbury’s structure generally supports its traditional retail objectives of uniform service and economies of scale, but it can hinder innovation, speed and morale if too rigid. For example, we might see slower decision-making on new store concepts. Alignment with the mission (“helping everyone eat better”) is mixed: the chain of command ensures quality and safety, but might stifle store-level initiatives for local community needs. By contrast, BHF’s flat model emphasizes the organisation’s humanitarian values of collaboration and responsiveness. In summary, while Sainsbury’s hierarchical structure ensures control and consistency in pursuing its core objectives, careful use of cross-functional teams and employee empowerment (organizational behaviour theories suggest that narrower spans and flatter elements boost engagement) is needed to meet strategic goals in a dynamic market.

Comparative Evaluation of Structural Models: Sainsbury’s and BHF

Communication Styles and Decision Speed

At BHF, decisions are often made collaboratively and horizontally, particularly in research grant funding and campaign design (British Heart Foundation, 2024). In contrast, Sainsbury’s top-down system ensures accountability but may slow innovation. During the COVID-19 pandemic, BHF’s structure enabled rapid reallocation of resources toward digital engagement, while Sainsbury’s required several layers of executive sign-off to implement nationwide changes.

Top Dissertation Topics UK

Adaptability and Mission Alignment

BHF’s flexible structure aligns well with its public health mission, allowing responsiveness to emerging cardiovascular research needs (British Heart Foundation, 2020). Sainsbury’s structure, while stable, may be misaligned with its new strategic goals around digital retail and sustainability unless adjusted to support faster, cross-disciplinary innovation.

Implications for Performance and Governance

Sainsbury’s structure enhances risk control and brand integrity; critical for a retail chain operating in highly regulated environments. However, BHF’s governance, overseen by a Board of Trustees in line with Charity Commission guidelines, promotes stakeholder inclusion and ethical oversight (British Heart Foundation, 2024). The trade-off between stability and agility reflects the differing institutional imperatives of a public company and a non-profit.

Alternative Structural Models and Future Fit

To better serve its evolving strategic goals (such as digital innovation, ESG leadership, and customer personalisation) Sainsbury’s may benefit from a hybrid structure. A matrix model could support cross-functional collaboration between IT, marketing, and operations for projects like e-commerce rollout or sustainability reporting.

Alternatively, an agile pod structure could be piloted within business units focused on innovation (e.g. mobile app development, loyalty platform enhancements). While wholesale structural transformation may be disruptive for a company of Sainsbury’s size, targeted decentralisation (especially at the store or regional level) could empower quicker decision-making.

Nevertheless, any change in structure should be checked against current compliance, the brand’s consistency and the resources available. While flatter decision structures are needed, the industry must still ensure control and manage risks due to strict regulations.

Conclusion

The current hierarchy in Sainsbury’s has helped the company achieve its goals of being consistent, efficient and large. Based on Mintzberg’s machine bureaucracy and Chandler’s structure–strategy thesis, it ensures central control and reliable execution which is necessary for running large retail chains in the UK.

However, as people’s needs change, technology affects retail and ESG standards become stricter, this structure could make it harder for the company to respond and innovate. A comparison with the British Heart Foundation shows that flatter models are useful for teamwork and flexibility, even when resources are limited.

Sainsbury’s can secure its future by gradually changing its structure: including agile teams, using matrix project structures and encouraging store-level creativity, while still keeping the advantages of standardisation and control. As organisational theory suggests, no structure is timeless; it must evolve with strategy, environment, and purpose.

References

Avkiran, M. (2022) ‘CureHeart wins Big Beat Challenge, a £30 million research award from the British Heart Foundation’, European Heart Journal, ehac510. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehac510

British Heart Foundation (2020) ‘Policy response to Covid-19’. Available at: https://www.bhf.org.uk/what-we-do/policy-and-public-affairs/policy-response-to-covid-19 (Accessed: 3 June 2025).

British Heart Foundation (2024) ‘How we are governed’. Available at: https://www.bhf.org.uk/what-we-do/our-people/how-we-are-governed (Accessed: 3 June 2025).

British Heart Foundation (2024) ‘How we award BHF funding and grants’. Available at: https://www.bhf.org.uk/for-professionals/information-for-researchers/how-we-award (Accessed: 3 June 2025).

British Heart Foundation (2024) ‘Written Evidence Submitted by the British Heart Foundation’. Available at: https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/11575/pdf/ (Accessed: 3 June 2025).

British Heart Foundation (2024) Annual Report and Accounts 2024. Available at: https://www.bhf.org.uk/-/media/files/what-we-do/annual-reports/annual-report-accounts-2024.pdf (Accessed: 3 June 2025).

Brooks, C., Parr, L., Smith, J.M., Buchanan, D., Snioch, D. and Hebishy, E. (2021) ‘A review of food fraud and food authenticity across the food supply chain, with an examination of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and Brexit on the food industry’, Food Control, 130, 108171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2021.108171

Carreno, A.M. (2024) ‘Breaking down silos: Strategies to overcome the collaboration trap and drive innovation’, Institute for Change Leadership and Business Transformation. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14294357 (Accessed: 3 June 2025).

Chatterjee, S. and Chaudhuri, R. (2022) ‘Supply chain sustainability during turbulent environment: Examining the role of firm capabilities and government regulation’, Operations Management Research, 15, pp. 1081–1095. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12063-021-00203-1

Dabor, I. L. (2023). Assessing Accountability of Directors under the UK Corporate Governance Code: Is ARGA the Corporate Governance Regulator we Need? (ResearchGate). Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/385130276_Assessing_Accountability_of_Directors_under_the_UK_Corporate_Code_Is_Arga_the_Corporate_Governance_Regulator_we_Need

Dike, H.W. (2025) ‘Revolutionizing the Workplace: Examining the Impact of Flat Hierarchies on Organizational Communication in a Developing Country’, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 9(4), pp. 6314–6331. Available at: https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.90400457 (Accessed: 3 June 2025).

Financial Reporting Council (FRC) (2024) Corporate Governance Code Guidance. Available at: https://www.frc.org.uk/library/standards-codes-policy/corporate-governance/corporate-governance-code-guidance/ (Accessed: 3 June 2025).

Irwansyah, I. (2021) ‘Adhocracy as a model for organizing government institution in simplifying Indonesian bureaucracy’, Jurnal Borneo Administrator, 17(2), pp. 241–258. https://doi.org/10.24258/jba.v17i2.832

Islam, M.J., Hossain, M.T., Mustafi, M.A.A., Moshiuddullah, A.B.M. and Sultana, H.M.M.U.H. (2022) ‘Henri Fayol’s 14 principles of management: Implications for the private commercial banks (PCBs) in Bangladesh’, KYAU Journal, 5(1), pp. 82–89. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/362404002_Henri_Fayol’s_14_Principles_of_Management_Implications_for_the_Private_Commercial_Banks_PCBs_in_Bangladesh (Accessed: 3 June 2025).

J Sainsbury plc (2025) Annual Report and Financial Statements 2025. Available at: https://www.about.sainsburys.co.uk/~/media/Files/S/Sainsburys/documents/reports-and-presentations/annual-reports/2025/sainsbury-annual-report-and-financial-statements-2025-accessible.pdf (Accessed: 3 June 2025).

J Sainsbury plc, 2024. Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024. (online) Available at: https://www.about.sainsburys.co.uk/~/media/Files/S/Sainsburys/documents/reports-and-presentations/2024/Preliminary%20Results/J%20Sainsbury%20Plc%20Preliminary%20Results%202324%20Factsheet.pdf (Accessed 3 Jun. 2025).

J Sainsbury plc. (2021) CDP Climate Change Disclosure 2021. Available at: https://www.about.sainsburys.co.uk/~/media/Files/S/Sainsburys/CRS%20Policies%20and%20Reports/CDP%20Climate%20Change%20Disclosure%202021.pdf (Accessed: 3 June 2025).

Jeleel-Ojuade, A. (2024) The role of information silos: An analysis of how the categorization of information creates silos within financial institutions, hindering effective communication and collaboration. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4881342

Kühl, S. (2023) ‘Strategy is structure: A systems theory-based definition of strategy’, Journal of Organizational Sociology, 1(3), pp. 251–286. https://doi.org/10.1515/joso-2023-0014

Ljevo, N. and Šunje, A. (2021) ‘The impact of organizational structure on the internationalization strategy’, Economic Review: Journal of Economics and Business, 19(2), pp. 27–36. https://doi.org/10.51558/2303-680X.2021.19.2.27

Monteiro, P. and Adler, P.S. (2022) ‘Bureaucracy for the 21st century: Clarifying and expanding our view of bureaucratic organization’, Academy of Management Annals, 16(2), pp. 427–475. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2019.0059

Nwadike, I.S. and Igbudu, J.N. (2024) ‘Application of POSDCORB plus EA in education for quality academic delivery in Nigeria’, Academia: Journal of Educational Research, 7(1). Available at: https://acjol.org/index.php/academia/article/view/4915 (Accessed: 3 June 2025).

Okolue, C.A., Oluwagbade, E., Bakare, A. and Animasahun, B. (2024) ‘Evaluating the economic and clinical impacts of pharmaceutical supply chain centralization through AI-driven predictive analytics: Comparative lessons from large-scale centralized procurement systems and implications for drug pricing, availability, and cardiovascular health outcomes in the U.S.’, International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews, 5(10), pp. 5148–5161. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/390943996 (Accessed: 3 June 2025).

Pfaff, Y.M., Wohlleber, A.J., Münch, C., Küffner, C. and Hartmann, E. (2023) ‘How digital transformation impacts organizational culture – A multi-hierarchical perspective on the manufacturing sector’, Computers & Industrial Engineering, 183, 109432. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2023.109432 (Accessed: 3 June 2025).

Rusanen, O. (2023) The importance of resources. In: The Red Queen Retail Race: An Innovation Pandemic in the Era of Digitization, p.13.

Sainsbury, 2024. Our story. (online) London Stock Exchange. Available at: https://www.londonstockexchange.com/stock/SBRY/sainsbury-j-plc/our-story (Accessed 3 Jun. 2025).

Sainsbury’s (n.d.) Plan for Better. Available at: https://www.about.sainsburys.co.uk/sustainability/plan-for-better (Accessed: 3 June 2025).

Sainsbury’s, 2025. Management. (online) Available at: https://www.about.sainsburys.co.uk/about-us/management (Accessed 3 Jun. 2025).

Shapsugova, M. (2023) ‘ESG principles and social responsibility’, E3S Web of Conferences, 420, 06040. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202342006040 (Accessed: 3 June 2025).

Smith, H.W. (2023) ‘GUPPI in supermarket mergers: the UK’s Asda/Sainsbury case’, in Kwoka, J., Valleti, T. and White, L. (eds.) Antitrust Economics at a Time of Upheaval. Forthcoming. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4370797 (Accessed: 3 June 2025).

Sudirjo, F. (2023) ‘Marketing strategy in improving product competitiveness in the global market’, Journal of Contemporary Administration and Management (ADMAN), 1(2), pp. 63–69. https://doi.org/10.61100/adman.v1i2.24 (Accessed: 3 June 2025).

Wolfram, I. and Székely, C. (2021) ‘Analysis of overhead costs management in companies’, ENTRENOVA – ENTerprise REsearch InNOVAtion, 7(1), pp. 23–33. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.54820/ZZRU4894 (Accessed: 3 June 2025).

Wonnink, N.K. (2025) The influence of structural aspects of a machine bureaucracy on change readiness of employees. Master’s thesis. University of Twente. Available at: http://essay.utwente.nl/106323/ (Accessed: 3 June 2025).

Xiao, B., Chen, Q. and Yu, Z. (2021) ‘Research on the investment value of Sainsbury’s’, in Proceedings of the 2021 6th International Conference on Social Sciences and Economic Development (ICSSED 2021), April 2021, pp. 108–115. Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210407.022

Explore Recent Blogs